Tobacco Companies Have Hidden the Dangers of Smoking For Years

Toward the end of 2006 you may have noticed thatjudge cited internal acknowledgment that this indeed
ads detailing smoking's adverse health effects startedwas the case. In 1999, the Clinton administration
appearing in newspapers across the country. This wasaccused the tobacco industry of racketeering as part
in response to an August of 2006 ruling by a federalof a coordinated plan to deceive the public about the
judge that the tobacco industry had actively engageddangers of smoking, and to cover up the knowledge
in racketeering practices. The judge stated that thethey had to the contrary.
industry had engaged in a decades-long conspiracy toUnder the ruling, the tobacco companies were also
hide the dangers of smoking from their users.ordered to stop using such descriptions as "low tar,"
Tobacco companies were actually ordered to take"light," "ultra light," "mild," or "natural," or any other
out newspaper ads criticizing their own product.descriptions that might seem as if these cigarettes
The judge ruled that the conspiracy started as earlyposed less of a health hazard or in any way were an
as 1953, when a group of tobacco companyattempt to downplay the dangers of smoking them.
executives met together at the Plaza Hotel in NewWhile this ruling was a victory for many anti-smoking
York City and developed a plan to counter the public'sand anti-tobacco campaigns, many commented on
health concerns about smoking. The judge also ruledhow long it took for the government to respond to
that even after the 1964 Surgeon General's reporttobacco's use and on how long the actual case itself
linked smoking to lung cancer, tobacco companiestook as well. Others felt that perhaps the court was
continued to deny and purposely distort many seriousnot punitive enough with the industry. "We are pleased
dangers of smoking their products.with the court's finding of liability on the part of the
Shockingly it was also ruled that the tobacco industrydefendants, but disappointed that the court did not
actively marketed their products to youth. That evenimpose all of the remedies sought by the government,"
though the tobacco industry claims it does not wantthe Justice Department said in a written statement.
children to smoke, the companies were caught"Nevertheless, we are hopeful that the remedies that
tracking youth behavior and preferences, therebywere imposed by the court can have a significant,
ensuring that "marketing and promotion reaches youth,"positive impact on the health of the American public."
even hiding from them the serious dangers of smokingTo many it seemed to be a hollow victory, but it still did
while their young bodies were still developing.some good in highlighting the real dangers of smoking
The tobacco industry was also faulted for publiclythat even the tobacco industry itself could not - or was
denying that second-hand smoke is dangerous. Theno longer allowed to - deny.