Ohio Cigar Smokers Brace Themselves

a piece of local news that has implications for cigarAlready, Jennifer Granholm--governor of neighboring
smokers all over the United States. Yet another stateMichigan--has proposed a huge increase in
legislature has noticed the tax-law loophole that hasnon-cigarette tobacco to help balance her troubled
made cigar smokers so happy over the years--andstate's budget. Under her plan, cigars, snuff and rolling
intends to close it.tobacco would face a doubled tax burden: from
Federal and state tax laws have long favored cigarthirty-two percent, under current law, to sixty-four
smokers--perhaps from legislators' inattention, perhapspercent. And unlike in Ohio, this proposal is coming from
because cigars are thought of more avorably, perhapsa Governor. Granholm suggested a similar measure in
from cigar makers' smaller advertising budgets and2007, which was killed by the state's
lower profile. In any case, cigarettes are more likely toRepublican-dominated Senate. However, that was
face high federal and state sales taxes, while cigarsbefore the current economic crisis.
are often exempted from these rules.This news comes hard on the heels of the first major
But an Ohio state representative has proposed a taxfederal-excise-tax increase on tobacco in over ten
hike on cigars, chewing tobacco, and other forms ofyears. Recent increases in funding for child health care
non-cigarette tobacco, which would raise the tax ratewill be paid for, partly, from a relatively large increase in
on all of these products fromtaxes on cigars, cigarettes, and loose tobacco.
seventeen-percent-of-wholesale to the fifty-fiveOther cash-strapped states contemplating similar
percent that Ohioans already pay on cigarettes. Themeasures include Pennsylvania, Arkansas and
representative touts possible decreases in MedicareKentucky. On the other side of the loophole,
spending as a financial benefit of the prospective lawmeanwhile, Oregonians may soon face a
change.sixty-cent-per-pack increase on cigarette taxes, with
A spokeswoman for Ohio's Democratic governor, Tedsupporters telling newspapers that they're confident
Strickland, has already disclaimed the governor'sthe measure (also rejected in 2007) will pass this
willingness to increase Ohio taxes. (Strickland's currentlegislative season. Mississippi lawmakers are similarly
budget proposal is free of any such increases, thoughconfident about their proposed cigarette-tax increase,
it does create a number of new fees or feewhich will raise rates from eighteen cents per pack
increases.) And since the current proposal wouldn't(the third-lowest cigarette tax in the nation) to a dollar
directly address the state's budgetaryeven. The measure has already passed the Mississippi
woes--Representative Tyrone Yates, who proposedHouse while a more modest increase (to forty-nine
the tax increase, says the money should go tocents) has cleared the Senate; negotiators have until
smoking-prevention programs instead--there's a decentthe end of March to broker a deal. Other states with
chance that Ohio legislators won't want to sign on.cigarette tax increases in the works include Utah and
But the news underscores the likelihood that, in leanpossibly North Carolina, where polls find a majority of
and hungry times, state as well as federal legislatorsadults support such an increase. Wisconsin governor
will eye new taxes on cigars as a possible source ofJim Doyle is pushing for a seventy-five cent
revenue. Given that most states face a budgetaryincrease--little more than a year after a dollar increase
crisis that makes the Federal Government's problemstook effect in January 2008. (Doyle's supporters
look almost easy--and that cigars are widely seen,concede that he may be overplaying his hand.)
especially by non-smokers, as a luxury item--manyMaybe, when you add it all up, it's still a little
legislators will be viewing the gap between cigar andsafer--tax-wise--to smoke cigars after all, loophole or
cigarette taxes with a critical eye.no loophole. It's certainly tastier.