The Health Hazards of Smoking

One of the biggest problems facing our world today is"Smokers tended to have a greater reduction in VC,
smoking, or more specifically smoking tobacco. StudyFVC, and FEV1/FVC relative to nonsmokers and an
of the respiratory system and the effects of smokingelevated RV/TLC ratio". All of these previous
on the respiratory system is one of the examinedexperiments clearly support the hypotheses stated in
health issues in our day. Emphysema, many differentthis laboratory experiment report, except for FVC
cancers, birth defects, and other severe lung problemswhich shouldn't be affected by tobacco smoke
are the result of smoking or other tobacco products.according to this support data, this information goes
The question posed by this laboratory experiment is toagainst what was previously hypothesized for the
see the affects of smoking related to immediateaffects of smoking on FVC values.
pulmonary functions on young adults.The data was gathered using a spirometer connected
The direct inhalation of tobacco smoke occurs first atvia Powerlab software and measured a broad range
the mouth, the smoke travels down the trachea,of pulmonary functions.
through the bronchi to each lung, then down to theMaterials and Methods:
bronchioles and into the alveolar and alveoli. The alveoliThis experiment was preformed to examine the lung
are where the greatest destruction is caused byvolumes and capacities, and many other pulmonary
tobacco smoke.functions. The experiment was conducted on the
This experiment is a perfect opportunity to study thestudents from all sections of biology 153 at the
affects of smoking on young adults in particular, andUniversity of Kentucky. A spirometry test was
tobacco's initial health effects on the user. If smoking ispreformed while at rest and after exercise, all data
directly related to a decrease in pulmonary function,was collected with Powerlab software. All data was
then people who smoke more than one pack a weekcorrelated and compiled using Microsoft Excel. This
or heavy smokers will show a dramatic difference indata should be relatively precise given that it was all
pulmonary measurements such as vital capacity (VC),gathered and collected by computer software.
functional residual capacity (FRC), forced vital capacityProcedures were followed as prescribed by the
(FVC), and the ratio of forced expired volume in onerespiration bulletin-experimental guide.
second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC),As detailed previously many pulmonary functions were
Compared to mild-smokers (less than or equal to onetested and correlated using data gathered by the
pack of cigarettes per week) or non-smokers. Thesespirometer, and Powerlab software. It effectively
will be the hypotheses tested in this lab report. Ifmeasured all of the values that are to be examined in
smoking does in fact affect these pulmonary functionsthis lab report (FVC, VC, and FEV1/FVC ratio). FRC
then there will be a noticeable difference in thesewas calculated using information gathered by the
values between the heavy smokers, mild-smokers,spirometer.
and non-smokers.The level of treatment in this experiment was the
The expected results of these tests would beamount of smoking. The three categories included level
anticipated to yield a great difference in the pulmonary1 (heavy smokers) and is indicated by the consumption
functions to be tested among the groups of individuals.of more than one pack per week, level 2 (mild
Greater differences among these results should besmokers) who consume less than but up to one pack
present in the data for after exercise was preformedper week, and level 3 (non-smokers) which consume
in the group of smokers.zero cigarettes per week.
A previous study indicated that "Abnormal spirometryThe data was not replicated among individuals but
(i.e., limitation of expiratory airflow, airways obstruction,was replicated 62 times over the entire Bio 153
or a low FEV1/FVC ratio the degree of airwaysdepartment among the students; two measurements
obstruction correlates closely with pathologic changesof pulmonary function were conducted on each
in the lungs of smokers and patients with COPDstudent that preformed the test once at rest and once
(Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)". Thisafter exercise. The control group for this experiment
provides more evidenced that the tests should providewas the non-smoker group, since they should have
noticeable differences in the FEV1/FVC ratio. Anothernormal and unaltered pulmonary functions, given that
study specifies that "smokers, ex-smokers, andnone of the students measured have any restrictive or
never-smokers had similar FVC and static lungobstructive disorders.
volumes". Which indicates this lab report should notThe population studied contained 62 individuals, 36
yield any differences in FVC values between thefemales and 26 males. 34 non-smokers, 19 heavy
groups of individuals studied. An alternative study alsosmokers, and 5 mild smokers, this population size and
suggested that "mean FRC and RV were higher ofcharacteristics were sufficient for the experiment
smokers had a significantly reduced FEV1" (Clark et al.conducted. Data was correlated into their respective
2001). This provides more support for the hypothesesgroups and measured for each of the values to be
presented in this lab report will yield expected results.tested; graphs were used to make it easy to see
The final piece of supportive data states thatimmediate differences among the group's variables.