| Early in 1995 the Ministry of Consumer and | | | | government did pay for replacements in |
| Commercial Relations (MCCR) announced a program | | | | government-funded non-profit and co-op housing.And |
| to replace up to 20,000 mid-efficiency gas furnaces in | | | | apparently, the program offered nothing to people who |
| Ontario, because their plastic vent pipes were prone to | | | | had already replaced their mid-efficiency furnaces |
| failure, and might leak carbon monoxide into the house. | | | | before this program was announced.On September 12, |
| Other sources indicated the number might have been | | | | 1995, the Ministry of Consumer and Commercial |
| as high as 40,000 - but no one knows for sure.The | | | | Relations issued a Safety Order requiring all owners of |
| crux of the problem was that no other type of vent | | | | heating appliances with high-temperature plastic vents |
| pipe had been approved for use with mid-efficiency | | | | to have these systems corrected by August 31, 1996. |
| furnaces.Hundreds of home owners planned to sue | | | | Gas utilities and propane suppliers were required by |
| the government, the manufacturers and others for | | | | Ontario law to discontinue the supply of fuel to |
| refusing to pay for the entire replacement. At that | | | | appliances which had not been corrected by the |
| point, home owners were expected to pay about | | | | deadline. Correction consisted of replacing the |
| $1000 of the estimated $1500 cost to exchange the | | | | defective vent with an approved alternate vent, if |
| furnaces for high-efficiency models, which would | | | | available, or replacing the whole heating system.Two |
| function safely with plastic vent pipes currently | | | | vent pipe manufacturers in Toronto claimed they had |
| available. The home builder was to pay $200, the | | | | safe, effective replacement vent pipes (a special |
| ONHWP $200, and the gas companies $100.By the | | | | grade of corrosion-resistant stainless steel) which |
| end of 1995 neither the Government of Ontario, which | | | | would solve the problem with mid-efficiency |
| approved the faulty vent pipes, nor the manufacturers | | | | installations. These replacement pipes had not yet |
| had made any contribution toward the cost of | | | | received approval, and for some furnaces, |
| replacements in private homes and businesses. But the | | | | replacements were never approved. |